In contributing to the ongoing discourse surrounding family law, Maya Achan, barrister at Coram Chambers, has co-authored a thought-provoking article with Amanda Weston KC from Garden Court Chambers.
Their piece, published in the March issue of Family Law delves into the complexities of legal parentage following the 17th annual Family Justice Council debate held in December 2024.
The event attracted a hybrid audience of around 100 invitees, all keen to engage with the question of whether the definition of ‘parent’ in family law should be broadened.
This year’s debate gathered an impressive lineup of esteemed speakers. Advocating for an expanded understanding of legal parentage were Natalie Gamble, a solicitor; Dr Sophie Zadeh, a Reader in family psychology; and Andrew Powell, a barrister with notable expertise in international surrogacy cases. In contrast, those presenting an opposing viewpoint included Dafni Lima, an assistant professor in law; Susannah Johnson KC; and Simon Rowbotham, Recorder, both seasoned family barristers.
The debate commenced with a poignant introduction from the President, setting the tone for a spirited yet respectful exchange of ideas.
Achan and Weston’s article captures the essence of this critical discussion, summarising the arguments for and against the proposal to widen the legal definition of parentage. They also draw upon recent legal authorities to provide nuanced observations about the implications of the debate’s overwhelmingly contentious outcome.
For those interested in the evolving landscape of family law and the intricate debates that shape it, Achan and Weston’s article offers valuable insights. You can read the full piece in the latest issue of Family Law here.
