Is ‘equal parental status’ a sufficient reason to grant a joint lives with order? If so, should it be?
Cason Yong, a Pupil Barrister with our chambers, has recently contributed an article on shared care arrangements to the Family Law Journal, published by Lexis Nexis.
In this article, Cason critically examines the growing trend towards shared care orders in family law, particularly in light of the 2024 decision AZ v BX (Child Arrangements Order: Appeal). He argues that while shared care can promote stability and equal parental involvement, there is a concern that family courts may be prioritising symbolic equality between the parents over the child’s welfare. This, he suggests, risks leading to one-size-fits-all decisions that fail to account for the complexities of individual family situations.
Drawing on key case law and recent research, Cason urges for a more cautious, case-by-case approach, emphasising that the focus must remain squarely on what’s truly best for the child, not simply on meeting the growing push for equal parenting.
To read the full article and explore this critical issue in greater depth, visit Family Law Journal here or read below.
